The Daily Report is distributed to e-mail participants of the
Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network (NAPSNet).
Other recent web version Daily Reports may be found in the
Recent Reports Folder.
Text versions of all previous Daily Reports may be accessed (using either web browsers or ftp software) in the
Daily Report Archive.
Please send news items, discussion contributions, subscription requests, or other comments to the Daily Report Editor at:
napsnet@nautilus.org.
In today's Report:
1. DPRK Proposes Normalization with US
The Washington Post (Andrew Browne, "N. KOREA DETAILS CONDITIONS
FOR FOUR PARTY TALKS," The Washington Post, 4/25/97) reported
that the DPRK has publicly announced three conditions to be met
before it will proceed with four-party talks. The DPRK wants
U.S. diplomatic relations, additional food aid and a lifting of
U.S. trade sanctions. The DPRK is also reported to be
encouraging the PRC to drop out of the four-party talks until its
conditions are met. Clinton has reportedly asked visiting Prime
Minister Hashimoto for Japan's support in persuading the DPRK to
proceed in the talks without conditions.
United Press International ("S.KOREA: NORTH'S PROPOSAL
'NONSENSE'," Seoul, 4/24/97) reported that ROK Foreign Ministry
Director General Yoo Myung-hwan called the DPRK proposal for
peace talks "nonsense," saying that the DPRK is trying to "put an
end to the issue of rice provision . . . and the lifting of U.S.
sanctions against it." (DPRK Vice Foreign Minister Kim Gye Gwan
had said earlier that the DPRK proposed a 'three-plus-one idea ,
excluding China until US negotiators build "confidence" with the
DPRK.)
The news release issued by the DPRK follows:
[END]
2. US View of Peace Talks Status
United Press International ("U.S. - N. KOREA TALKS, RELATIONS ON
ICE," Washington, 4/22/97) reported that the US is unwilling to
make any further movement towards normalizing relations with the
DPRK until its leaders engage in peace negotiations with the ROK.
The US has rejected linking food aid to the talks; however, has
hinted heavily that future appeals from the UN World Food Program
"would not go unanswered." Although low level talks between the
US and DPRK will continue, the article quoted State Department
spokesman Nicholas Burns as saying, "our relationship with North
Korea will be severely circumscribed until North Korea goes
forward with the talks." . [Ed. note: Excerpts from Burns'
comments on DPRK- related issues at this briefing will be
distributed in a separate posting.]
3. US Response to Hwang's Statements and DPRK Threat
United Press International ("PENTAGON: NORTH KOREA 'STILL A
THREAT'", Washington DC, 4/22/97) reported that US Defense
Department spokesman Ken Bacon said that the US believes that the
DPRK "could have generated enough plutonium to make at least one
nuclear weapon" before the Agreed Framework was signed in 1994.
However, Bacon said Washington believes that the DPRK nuclear
program is frozen. Bacon also stated that the US considers the
DPRK military capability to be "troubling," but that the US
troops in the ROK are adequate to maintain peace in the region.
[Ed. note: Excerpts from Bacon's comments on DPRK- related issues
at this briefing will be distributed in a separate posting.]
The Associated Press ("N.KOREA CALLS DEFECTOR DERANGED," Seoul,
4/23/97) reported that the US Presidential spokesman Mike McCurry
said Wednesday that the US knows "a great deal" about the DPRK
weapons status, but declined to say whether of not the US agrees
with Hwang's report. [Ed. note: Excerpts from McCurry's comments
on DPRK- related issues at this briefing will be distributed in a
separate posting.]
4. DPRK Response to Hwang Statements
The Associated Press ("N.KOREA CALLS DEFECTOR DERANGED," Seoul,
4/23/97) reported that the DPRK "warned of war" if the ROK
continues to use Hwang Jang Yop to defame the DPRK. The article
reported that the Korea Central News Agency called Hwang's
statement "nothing but the outcry of a crazy man sick with
paranoia, eccentricity and mental derangement". KCNA attributed
the quote to a spokesman for the National Democratic Front of
South Korea, which the DPRK says is an indigenous dissident
organization inside the ROK. ROK officials say it is a
fictitious organization used by the DPRK for propaganda.
1. ROK Hunts Pro-North Koreans
A top ROK government official gave strong indication yesterday
that the government will launch a crackdown on pro-DPRK figures
with the aid of DPRK defector Hwang Jang-yop. "We don't know yet
whether he had access to such information (when he was in the
North), but I expect that relevant authorities will look into
the matter," the official said. However, he quickly added that
if Hwang's allegations of many pro-Pyongyang figures operating
in the ROK turn out to be true, they will have to be ferreted
out. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, made the
remarks in response to the latest allegation by Hwang that pro-
DPRK figures have been planted among the ROK's military, police
and other public agencies. Hwang, the highest-ever DPRK
official to defect to the ROK, said in a report published
yesterday that the DPRK has long tried to nurture "underground
organizations" in the ROK. The Chosun Ilbo, a Korean daily
newspaper said Hwang, wrote the report in August when he was
preparing to defect to the ROK. Similar reports came out of
Beijing when the former DPRK Workers Party secretary was holed
up at the ROK Embassy in the PRC capital. It has raised the
specter of a "McCarthyist" purge of leftist and pro-DPRK figures
in the ROK and has quickly become a hot political issue in the
ROK which is to hold a presidential election in about eight
months. In the generally conservative and anti-Communist ROK,
ties to the DPRK and leftist groups can be a fatal blow to any
presidential hopeful and political party. (Korea Herald, "HWANG
EXPECTED TO FACILITATE HUNT FOR PRO-NORTH KOREAN FIGURES," Chon
Shi-young, 04/23/97)
ROK Deputy Prime Minister Kwon O-kie reaffirmed yesterday before
the National Assembly's Unification Committee that the ROK is not
considering additional food aid to the DPRK on a government level
unless the DPRK comes to the proposed four-way peace talks. Kwon
also made it clear that private-level food assistance to
Pyongyang will be made through the single channel of the Korean
National Red Cross (KNRC), while regretting that some civic
groups had made moves to convey grain to the DPRK directly.
Regarding private food aid, Kwon said that, "Such moves may send
a wrong signal to the North." Kwon's remarks coincided with the
breakdown of the talks held in New York to persuade the DPRK to
join the peace negotiations with the ROK, the US, and the PRC.
The KNRC last week proposed to its northern counterpart that the
two sides meet at the truce village of Panmunjom to discuss food
aid to the DPRK. In a surprisingly quick response, the DPRK
counter proposed that the meeting be held in Beijing. "We will
soon answer the North's proposal. But I still believe Beijing is
not an appropriate place for the Red Cross talks," Kwon told the
committee. (Korea Herald, "SOUTH LINKS NORTH KOREAN FOOD AID TO
FOUR-WAY PEACE TALKS," 04/23/97)
A senior ROK official said yesterday that there still seemed to
be discord in the DPRK leadership over its entry into the four-
way peace talks proposed by the ROK and the US. The three sides
have agreed on the draft text of a joint statement containing the
schedule for peace talks but the DPRK delegation changed their
attitude after receiving instructions from Pyongyang, which
caused the briefing to end inconclusively on Monday, he said. The
official said the DPRK delegates, while demanding massive food
aid as a precondition for participation in peace talks, also
mentioned worries in Pyongyang over outside pressure to force a
change of its regime. He predicted the DPRK would return to the
negotiation table with the ROK and the US, giving no specific
time. Some analysts here believe that the DPRK's refusal to set-
up the peace talks, may have been affected by top DPRK defector
Hwang Jang-yop's hard-toned arrival statement. The analysts also
suggest that it is possible that the DPRK believes the upcoming
shipment of international humanitarian food aid will enable it to
buy more time to draw more concessions from the ROK and the US.
However, following the end of the New York talks with no result,
the ROK has shown a reserved stance on inter-Korean Red Cross
talks on food aid to the North. (Korea Herald, "NORTH KOREAN
LEADERSHIP STILL SPLIT ON 4-WAY TALKS," 04/23/97)
An essay written by Hwang Jang-yop Aug. 23 last year while
preparing for his defection was carried in a Korean vernacular
yesterday. The paper, dubbed "On the Problem of Choson," deals
with such issues as how to counter the DPRK military threat and
what should be done for a peaceful unification of the two Koreas
as well as Hwang's description of leader Kim Jong-il. The paper
puts flesh on the skeleton of rumors and speculations that
Hwang's defection has produced. In reference to a much denied
list of pro-DPRK forces in the ROK, the so-called "Hwang's List,"
he writes that "the enemy within is more malign than the enemy
without." Hwang writes that the two Koreas should cooperate to
unify, but Seoul needs to initiate this. He says that "only the
fool of fools would think that the North is sincere about
peaceful unification in word and deed." In February, Hwang wrote
that before the two can unify, the economic gap between the ROK
and the DPRK should be like the difference between heaven and
earth, saying that "The South should leave the North to maintain
to its militaristic line, and let its economy dwindle rather than
forcing it to open and reform." Also, Hwang notes, the ROK should
not fool themselves into thinking that they can deter the North's
military threat, but instead should work closely with the US and
Japan. In describing the de-facto leader Kim Jong-il, Hwang
writes that Kim idolizes Hitler, and has a keen political and
artistic sense, punctuated by fits of jealousy and anger. (Korea
Herald, "NORTH KOREA RELENTLESSLY BUILDING UP NUKE, CHEMICAL WAR
CAPABILITY," 04/23/97)
4. DPRK Remains a "Real Threat"
In a speech given to members of the Korea America Friendship
Society, Gen. John Tilelli, commander in chief of the US Forces
Korea (USFK), stressed the importance of continuing a firm Korea-
US military alliance as the DPRK still poses a "real threat"
despite its "economic collapse." The US general, also commander
of the ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command, stated that "We and the
ROK government are absolutely unified in our policy toward North
Korea." He added that, "The Korean peninsula remains an uncertain
and unpredictable place and therefore the threat to peace and
stability is real and dangerous." (Korea Times, "NK REMAINS
'REAL THREAT' DESPITE PROSPECTS OF MASS HUNGER: TILELLI,"
04/23/97)
The NAPSNet Daily Report aims to serve as a forum for dialogue
and exchange among peace and security specialists.
Conventions for readers and a list of acronyms and
abbreviations are available to all recipients.
For descriptions of the world wide web sites used to gather
information for this report, or for more information on web
sites with related information, see the collection of
other NAPSNet resources.
Produced by the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development.
Wade Huntley: napsnet@nautilus.org
Choi Chung-moon: cily@star.elim.net
Peter Razvin: icipu@glas.apc.org
Chunsi Wu: dlshen@fudan.ihep.ac.cn
Dingli Shen: dlshen@fudan.ihep.ac.cn
Hiroyasu Akutsu: akutsu@glocomnet.or.jp
1. DPRK Proposes Normalization with US
II. Republic of Korea
2. US View of Peace Talks Status
3. US Response to Hwang's Statements and DPRK Threat
4. DPRK Response to Hwang Statements
1. ROK Hunts Pro-North Koreans
2. Four Party Peace Talks
3. DPRK Nuclear Build Up
4. DPRK Remains a "Real Threat"
I. United States
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Permanent Mission to the United Nations
PRESS-RELEASE BY THE DPR KOREA DELEGATION
(New York, April 22, 1997)
In the meeting with the U.S. and south sides between April 16 and
22, 1997 in New York, the DPRK delegation announced its position
to agree on the four party peace talks.
Stemming from this position, we also put forward a proposal for
realizing the talks.
In other words, we proposed a "three plus one (3 + 1)" formula of
holding tripartite talks in advance of the four party talks so as
to make it more substantial and productive one.
In light with all issues raised in the course of the joint
briefing and response meeting, we believe that the proposal we
presented this time is realistic, reasonable and productive.
To this extend [sic], we are prepared to continue to have
necessary contacts.
II. Republic of Korea
We invite you to reply to today's report, and we welcome
commentary or papers for distribution to the network.
Berkeley, California, United States
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Moscow, Russian Federation
Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Tokyo, Japan