The Daily Report is distributed to e-mail participants of the
Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network (NAPSNet).
Other recent web version Daily Reports may be found in the
Recent Reports Folder.
Text versions of all previous Daily Reports may be accessed (using either web browsers or ftp software) in the
Daily Report Archive.
Please send news items, discussion contributions, subscription requests, or other comments to the Daily Report Editor at:
napsnet@nautilus.org.
In today's Report:
US Department of Defense Spokesman Ken Bacon ("PENTAGON
SPOKESMAN'S REGULAR BRIEFING," USIA Transcript, 5/15/97) issued
the following statement: "I'd like to announce that the United
States and North Korea have reached agreement on two important
measures to allow us to continue with our efforts to sort out
what happened to prisoners of war and soldiers missing in action
from the Korean War. As you know, meetings were held in New York
last week, and they ended without agreement. But after those
meetings, we were able to reach agreement on two of the three
issues we had raised with the North Koreans. Those issues are
joint recovery operations for remains in North Korea. Both sides
have agreed that the U.S. will be able to conduct three joint
recovery operations. U.S. teams working with North Koreans in
North Korea will be able to conduct three recovery operations
this year. Second, U.S. researchers will be able to go to the
archives in Pyongyang to look for archival information that may
be left over from the Korean War. They also will work in a joint
team with the North Koreans. The third issue was our request that
we be allowed to interview American defectors in North Korea. We
believe that six Americans defected to North Korea in the 1960s,
and we believe that four of those are still alive in North Korea.
We've asked for permission to go interview them in order to learn
if they have information about POWs they might have met from the
Korean War era. There has been no agreement yet to allow us to do
that, so discussions on that issue will continue. These are, I
believe, significant breakthroughs from our week of negotiations
with the North Koreans last week. They, in a joint statement that
was issued in Pyongyang and we will issue it to you today, both
sides expressed hope that the agreement will build trust between
the two countries and make positive contributions towards
developing the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and North
Korea. I want to be very clear, though, that these two agreements
apply only to our efforts to find out as much information as we
can about POWs and MIAs." Bacon subsequently answered a number
of questions related to this announcement.
2. US Views of DPRK Threat and PRC Role
US Department of Defense Spokesman Ken Bacon ("PENTAGON
SPOKESMAN'S REGULAR BRIEFING," USIA Transcript, 5/16/97)
commented on remarks made by General John Shalikashvili, Chairman
of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a speech at the PRC National
Defense University on May 14 [Ed. note: See "US Military Leader's
Views of DPRK Threat" in the May 15 Daily Report]. Asked whether
the US Department of Defense endorsed Shalikashvili's view that
the DPRK represents the greatest threat to peace in the Asia-
Pacific region and that the intercession of the PRC would be
useful, Bacon said, "We welcome efforts by all countries to try
to reduce the tensions on the Korean Peninsula. I think our
policy on that has been very clear. As you know, President
Clinton last year proposed four-party talks to bring about peace
and reconciliation on the Korean Peninsula. Those talks involve
China, the United States, North Korea, and the Republic of Korea.
So we are very much in favor of Chinese involvement in efforts to
bring peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula."
The Associated Press ("SEOUL OFFERS N.KOREA $10M FOOD AID,"
Seoul, 5/16/97) reported that the ROK's government-controlled Red
Cross, in response to the standing appeal by the UN World Food
Program, on Friday pledged to provide US$10 million worth of corn
and powdered milk to the DPRK. ROK Unification Ministry officials
said the latest government money will be used to buy 50,000 tons
of foreign corn and 300 tons of ROK milk powder, which will be
delivered by the World Food Program within two months.
Previously, Seoul had donated US$9 million through the UN to help
alleviate the North's food shortage. The pledge followed a
proposal by the ROK Red Cross for new meetings with its DPRK
counterpart to discuss direct government-to-government food aid.
Earlier, Kang Young-hoon, president of the ROK Red Cross society,
proposed that Red Cross representatives of both Koreas meet at
the border or in either of the two capitals, Seoul and Pyongyang,
next Friday. The proposal was made in a message to his DPRK
counterpart, Li Sung Ho, passed through the border village of
Panmunjom. There was no immediate reply. Earlier this month, the
first inter-Korean Red Cross talks in five years were held in
Beijing, but negotiations over direct government-to-government
food aid broke down after the DPRK refused to discuss procedures
of delivery until the ROK specified the amount and timing of the
aid. The ROK Red Cross now says it can give the North specific
figures.
The Associated Press (Alison Smale, "NUCLEAR INSPECTORS GAIN MORE
POWER," Vienna, Austria, 5/16/97) reported that the International
Atomic Energy Agency has given its inspectors broad new powers to
probe the nuclear programs of states under its authority. Hans
Blix, director-general of the Vienna-based agency, said the new
rules should help inspectors catch infractions they previously
missed. "This is a leap forward," Blix said. "We think the new
measures give us a much greater chance of discovering anything
clandestine." Provision of the powers was prompted by recent IAEA
failures in Iraq and the DPRK. In the early 1990s, the agency and
the world were shocked to uncover details of a secret Iraqi
nuclear weapons program that IAEA inspectors failed to detect
when they visited facilities of what Iraq claimed was its
peaceful nuclear program. Similar suspicions about the DPRK's
nuclear program were seemingly confirmed when Pyongyang
threatened to withdraw from the 1970 nuclear non-proliferation
treaty, and thus avoid IAEA inspections. The new approach vastly
expands the IAEA's powers to keep watch on peaceful nuclear
programs, to register clues of any clandestine activity, and --
most importantly -- to visit suspicious sites or to investigate
suspicious activity. However, whether IAEA inspectors will be
able to exercise their new powers remains to be seen, as one of
the IAEA's main problems has been the unwillingness of Iraq and
the DPRK to cooperate with inspectors. [Ed. note: See also the
press release in Section IV, below.]
Foreign governments are not heeding a call for donations to a
program to buy high-energy milk for malnourished DPRK children,
and relief workers said Wednesday they want to know why. UNICEF,
in a combined UN appeal on April 7, asked for US$4.7 million to
buy specially formulated milk to help children recover from
extreme malnutrition. But Anthony Hewett, in charge of the UN
children agency's regional office responsible for the DPRK, said
Wednesday that no donations had yet been received. UNICEF has had
to divert funds targeted for other parts of the world to the
DPRK. Hewett said the DPRK's long isolation may have contributed
to the lack of donor response because some countries "may feel it
is remote and unknowable." Relief workers have come back from the
reclusive country with accounts of families eating grass, weeds
and bark, children whose growth has been stunted by malnutrition,
and hospitals running short of medicine and fuel. UN and relief
agencies have long warned that the country faces famine unless it
receives large-scale aid. The DPRK government has said that 134
children died last year from malnutrition, but "we believe that
it is many more children that have perished," said Runar
Soerensen, who is in charge of the UNICEF office in the DPRK
capital Pyongyang. (Korea Times, "APPEALS FOR NK CHILDREN HIT
DEAF EARS: UN AGENCY," 05/16/97)
The ROK's Korea National Red Cross (KNRC) is considering spending
about 5 percent of its annual budget, roughly 1.5 billion won, on
food aid to the DPRK. A KNRC spokesman said, "The KNRC plans to
earmark some of its budget for DPRK food aid in a bid to bolster
private-level aid activities nationwide and show its willingness
to actively take part in the food aid drive." The Red Cross
society, which called on religious and civic organizations to
join fund-raising activities on May 12, is currently receiving
commitments from them. "The KNRC is expected to propose a Red
Cross meeting with its northern counterpart within this month
after coming up with an estimate on how much aid it can provide
to North Korea," the official said. The estimate will depend on
the level of private organizations' commitments and other
civilian donations, he added. "The donation the KNRC is
considering might be 5 percent or 1.5 billion won of our total
budget of 30 billion won," he said. The plan will be decided on
at a meeting of the KNRC's 13 branch heads, scheduled for May 21,
he added. The KNRC's idea is construed as a step to mitigate some
criticism that it has only played a role in conveying relief
goods, collected by the private sector, to its DPRK counterpart.
"The KNRC's projected contribution will have a positive influence
on the materialization of the second Red Cross talks between the
two Koreas," a government official commented. However, the KNRC's
planned assistance will be "purely private," because the Red
Cross society is only supposed to convey private donations to the
DPRK, he said. "There is no change in our stance that the
government's large-scale aid (to the North) will be pushed for
only after the North accepts the proposed four-way talks for
peace on the Korean peninsula," he added. (Korea Times, "KNRC
CONSIDERING SPENDING 5 PERCENT OF BUDGET ON NK FOOD AID,"
05/16/97)
Vietnam has offered 1,000 tons of rice to help the DPRK through
its current famine, the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry said
Wednesday. "In order to contribute towards helping the North
Korean people overcome their food problems, our Prime Minister Vo
Van Kiet decided recently to donate 1,000 tons of rice to North
Korean children," a ministry spokesman said. He said Vietnam had
last year offered a certain quantity of rice to the DPRK and sold
it some more on good terms. According to informed sources, Hanoi
had rejected an earlier request from Pyongyang for 50,000 tons of
rice on credit for five years. (Korea Times, "VIETNAM TO OFFER
1,000 TONS OF RICE TO N. KOREA," 05/16/97)
4. DPRK Military to Oversee Farming
The DPRK regime has instructed military units to oversee farming
in an effort to surmount dire food shortages, intelligence
officials said Wednesday. DPRK leader Kim Jong-il instructed the
Ministry of People's Armed Forces earlier this spring to have
control over farming, said the officials from the agency for
National Security Planning (NSP), revealing the findings of their
questioning of the two DPRK families who defected Monday to the
ROK by boat. In accordance with the instruction, the defectors
were quoted as saying, commanders of military units of all levels
were named to chair regional farm management committees and carry
out farming plans. Pyongyang has expanded its criteria for
military conscription by admitting to the armed forces since 1994
even the so-called "men of impure (non-proletarian) family
backgrounds." Youths who were previously exempted from
conscription are now allowed to join and serve in the military
until the age of 22, the DPRK defectors were quoted as having
said. The length of military service has also been extended to 13
years from October last year. The move has resulted in discontent
among servicemen who had been about to be discharged from the
military. (Korea Times, "N. KOREAN MILITARY OFFICERS OVERSEE
FARMING AT KIM JONG-IL'S ORDER: NSP ," 05/16/97)
5. PRC Concern over DPRK Exodus
An average of 30-40 starving DPRK residents are fleeing across
the border to the PRC every day, a German daily reported
Wednesday. The daily, citing internal data from the PRC
government, said PRC border guards used to look the other way out
of sympathy, but are now unconditionally turning back the
refugees out of the fear that hundreds of thousands of North
Koreans could flee across the border if the situation is allowed
to continue. (Joong Ang Ilbo, "30-40 NORTH KOREANS ESCAPE TO
CHINA DAILY," 05/16/97)
6. ROK Foreign Minister's Itinerary
ROK Foreign Minister Yoo Chong-ha will visit the PRC, the US,
France and Germany on a trip May 18-29, according to the ministry
spokesman. Yoo will visit Beijing May 18-20 at the invitation of
his PRC counterpart Qian Qichen on the occasion of the fifth
anniversary of the normalization of relations between the ROK and
the PRC. Yoo and Quian are expected to review the overall
situation of the past five years of their countries' bilateral
links and exchange opinions on wide-ranging issues of mutual
interest. After his Beijing visit, Yoo will fly to New York to
preside over a meeting of the United Nations Security Council as
its president. During his May 21-22 stay there, Yoo will meet
with UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to discuss questions facing
the world body and issues related to the Korean peninsula, a
ministry spokesman said. On May 22, he will speak at a working
luncheon sponsored by the Korea Society on the theme of Korea-US
relations. From New York, he will visit Washington DC May 22-24,
during which he will have talks with US Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright and other senior Clinton administration
officials on issues the two countries have in common. Minister
Yoo will then go onto France, where he will attend a ministerial
conference of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), which will be held in Paris May 25-26. Then,
Yoo will make an official visit to Germany May 26-27 for a
meeting with German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel. (Korea Times,
"FOREIGN MINISTER YOO TO VISIT CHINA, UN, OECD MAY 18-29,"
05/16/97)
Hans Blix, director general of the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA), will visit the ROK on May 25 to attend an
international symposium on atomic energy to be held in Taejon.
During his four-day stay here, Blix is scheduled to pay a
courtesy call on ROK President Kim Young-sam at Chong Wa Dae,
officials said. Blix is to meet with high-ranking Seoul officials
such as Foreign Minister Yoo Chong-ha and Science-Technology
Minister Kwon Sook-il to exchange views on issues of mutual
concern. Topics for their dialogue will be the ROK's efforts to
block Taiwan's plan to ship nuclear waste to the DPRK,
Pyongyang's freeze of its nuclear activities under the 1994 deal
in Geneva, and the upcoming election of his successor. The
symposium will be held under the joint auspices of the IAEA and
the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. (Korea Times, "IAEA
CHIEF BLIX TO VISIT KOREA MAY 25," 05/16/97)
The Sankei Shimbun (Hiroshi Yuasa, "JAPAN MAY FALL WITHIN DPRK'S
RODONG I TARGET RANGE," Washington, 1, 5/13/97) reported that US
military sources revealed that despite the common perception that
the DPRK' s Rodong I intermediate ballistic missile has a maximum
range of one thousand kilometers, it actually can travel one
thousand and three hundred kilometers, far enough to reach Tokyo.
According to the report, US reconnaissance satellites found that
three Rodong I missiles have already been deployed along the Sea
of Japan, and seven more missiles will soon be in place. The
report pointed out that given the Rodong I's ability to carry not
only nuclear but also chemical warheads, review of Japan's
defense policy -- especially Japan's policy toward a US-led
theater missile defense (TMD) initiative -- is becoming more
critical.
The Sankei Shimbun ("JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER TO VISIT RUSSIA
LATE THIS MONTH," 2, 5/11/97) reported that Japanese Foreign
Minister Yukihiko Ikeda revealed that he has decided to pay a
three-day visit to Russia May 23 to lay new ground work for
negotiations on the Northern Territory issue. The report pointed
out that Ikeda's visit is expected to reactivate Japan-Russia
negotiations on fishing and economic exchange in the Northern
Territories. Negotiations have been deadlocked because of
Yeltsin's health and Russia's domestic problems. The report also
said that Ikeda will encourage Russia's cooperation in
strengthening anti-terrorism, which is one of the agenda items at
the Denver Summit slated for late June.
3. US Asia-Pacific Defense Policy
The Nikkei Shimbun ("CURRENT US MILITARY PERSONNEL NUMBERS TO
REMAIN IN ASIA-PACIFIC," Washington, 2, 5/13/97) reported that US
Defense Secretary William Cohen revealed at a think tank session
in Washington May 12 that the coming Quadrennial Defense Review
(QDR) will announce that the ten thousand US military personnel
presently in the Asia-Pacific region will remain. Cohen cited as
reasons for maintaining the current troop strength the
uncertainty of the PRC's future intentions in the wake of
expanding PRC military power, in addition to tensions on the
Korean Peninsula. However, Cohen emphasized that containment is
not a US policy option and that the decision to maintain current
forces in the region is not meant to antagonize the PRC but
instead to prepare for the uncertainties in the region.
The Asahi Shimbun ("JAPAN'S LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (LDP) POLICY
RESEARCH COUNCIL HEAD URGES RESUMPTION OF JAPAN-DPRK
INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS," 2, 5/13/97) reported that Taku
Yamazaki, LDP Chairman of the Policy Research Council, said
during his speech in Tokyo May 12 that quick resumption of Japan-
DPRK negotiations, including those on the DPRK's suspected
kidnapping of Japanese civilians, is urgent.
The Daily Yomiuri ("SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SDP), NEW PARTY
SAKIGAKE (PIONEERS) AGREE ON N. KOREA VISIT," 2, 5/15/97)
reported that the SDP and Sakigake agreed at a regular meeting
May 14 to send a joint delegation to the DPRK, involving the
ruling LDP. According to the report, leaders of the General
Federation of Korean Residents (Chongryun) told SDP Secretary
General Shigeru Ito that the DPRK Workers' Party wants the
delegation to come soon. Both the SDP and Sakigake will ask the
LDP to discuss forming a joint delegation. The report added that
although not part of the Cabinet, the SDP and Sakigake both
support the LDP-led government.
The Yomiuri Shimbun ("DPRK MAY ALLOW JAPANESE WIVES TO VISIT
JAPAN," 1, 5/16/97) reported that several governmental sources
revealed that the DPRK has told the Japanese government that it
will allow Japanese wives and relatives in the DPRK to visit
their relatives in Japan. The move came in response to the
Japanese government's demand, during a secret Japan-DPRK working-
level consultation held May 10-11 in Beijing, that the DPRK
respond to the alleged abduction cases. This is the first time in
forty years that the DPRK has expressed its intention to allow
Japanese wives to visit Japan. The report pointed out that the
reasons for the DPRK's decision may include potential Japanese
food aid to the DPRK, a possibility supported by a source from
the Japanese Foreign Ministry. The report also expects that the
decision may re-energize Japan-DPRK negotiations on normalization
of bilateral diplomatic relations. However, the report pointed
out that the process may take some time because, according to
some high-ranking Foreign Ministry official, the number of
Japanese wives who will be allowed to visit Japan is not yet
clear, and because difficult problems still remain unsolved
between the two countries, including the alleged abduction cases.
The Sankei Shimbun ("DPRK GETTING CLOSER TO SOUTHEAST ASIA FOR
RICE," Bangkok, 5, 5/11/97) reported that the DPRK has invited
the foreign ministers from Myanmar, Vietnam and Thailand to enter
negotiations on rice aid to the DPRK. According to the report,
the DPRK has criticized the US for its harsh stance on Myanmar's
alleged human rights abuse and has supported Myanmar's entry into
the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to facilitate
rice aid from Myanmar, which has been frozen since 1994 because
of the DPRK's inability to pay for the deal. The report also said
that the DPRK invited a visit by a high-ranking Thai official in
February 1996, and that the DPRK Vice Prime Minister visited
Vietnam last month to ask both Thailand and Vietnam for food aid
to the DPRK, although both countries declined the offer. The
report pointed out that Thailand and Vietnam are unlikely to
accept the most recent offer, but warned that given that some
countries have different views on human rights in Southeast Asia,
DPRK diplomacy should be watched carefully.
The Yomiuri Shimbun ("JAPAN-US JOINT PLAN ON REGIONAL CRISES,"
Evening Edition 1, 5/15/97) reported that the Japanese and US
governments decided to start work later this year on a plan to
jointly tackle crises in the region around Japan. This new
effort is tentatively titled "The Joint Plan to Deal with Crises
in Areas Around Japan," and will cover not only the role of
Japanese Self Defense Forces but that of other ministries and
agencies in the event of an emergency. However, the possibility
of a confrontation on the Korean Peninsula will certainly be a
central concern, said the sources cited in the report. The
report also said that concrete measures will include Japan's
logistical support for the US military and the way Japan and the
US would deal with refugees. The work will begin after a review
of guidelines for Japan-US Defense cooperation is completed, and
is expected to clarify so-called "gray zone" cooperation, left
unclear because of Japan's constitutional restraint on collective
defense.
1. DPRK-Taiwan Nuclear Waste Deal
[On May 15, Greenpeace issued the following press release,
entitled "Taiwan Power Company Misrepresents Radioactivity Of
Nuclear Waste To Be Sent To North Korea."]
Greenpeace today announced the discovery of major
misrepresentations in the classification of radioactive waste to
be exported by Taiwan Power Company (Taipower) to North Korea.
Greenpeace spokesperson Ho Wai Chi said the discovery raises
serious concerns for the safe transport and storage of the waste.
"The waste is significantly more radioactive than Taipower
claims," said Ho. "Taipower has misled the people of Taiwan, the
international community and the governments of neighboring
countries about the dangers associated with shipping and
disposing of their radioactive waste in North Korea."
Taipower, Taiwan's government-run power utility, signed a
contract in January to skip up to 200,000 barrels of low level
waste for final storage in North Korea. The shipments are
expected to begin in a few months.
The Greenpeace team was accompanied by Mr. John Large of Large &
Associates, a British nuclear engineering firm retained by
Greenpeace to do an independent evaluation of Taiwan's nuclear
waste sector. The group conducted a 10-day study of the nuclear
waste sector, and inspected waste facilities at the Kuo Sheng
nuclear power plant and on Lanyu Island.
They discovered that the so-called low level radioactive waste,
which Taipower plans to export to North Korea, contains ion
exchange resins and filter masses, some of the most dangerous
wastes produced by nuclear reactors.
"The waste that Taipower chooses to call low level, and claims
will not demand special handling, is actually a soup of highly
radioactive poisons that requires complex technology, highly
trained personnel, and a fully developed infrastructure in order
to fulfill the most rudimentary safety requirements," said Mr.
Large. "it is difficult to believe Taipower assurances that North
Korea can deal with this waste safely, when they don't ever tell
the truth to their own people about what the waste contains."
Greenpeace also discovered unsafe conditions at Taiwan's Lanyu
Island radioactive waste storage site. Radiation levels recorded
on the perimeter of a Storage trench indicate that radioactive
materials may be leaking from storage drums. In addition, there
appeared to be a lack of adequate facilities for treatment of
contaminated water, a serious shortcoming in a climate of
typhoons and torrential rains.
This compares with a new waste storage facility, built at the Kuo
Sheng plant after lengthy protests from local residents which
contains a number of basic safety features, and replaces an older
Lanyu-type facility which officials say was unsatisfactory.
"It took Kuo Sheng residents 10 years to force Taipower to build
a storage facility that conforms to even basic safety
requirements," said Ho. "The people of Lanyu, despite years of
protest, are still living atop a leaking dump. And if the barrels
are moved to North Korea, what voice will those residents have to
protect their families from danger?"
"By exporting their waste, Taipower is creating the potential for
serious environmental consequences for North Korea," Ho added.
"Taipower must deal with their own waste, including removing it
from Lanyu island, and they must immediately cancel this
dangerous and irresponsible agreement with North Korea."
[On May 16, VERTIC issued the following press release, entitled
"Letting The Nuclear Watchdog Off The Leash."]
At a special meeting, the International Atomic Energy Agency's
Board of Governors last night approved radical plans to reform
nuclear safeguards and therefore fortify the 186-member Non-
Proliferation Treaty.
With the discovery of Iraq's clandestine nuclear-weapon programme
and problems verifying North Korea's nuclear activities, it was
clear that the 1972 nuclear safeguards agreement was in need of
an overhaul. Although the study on the new safeguards system was
completed by 1995, since then there have been protracted
negotiations to finalize the necessary protocol.
Last month, the Special Safeguards Committee approved the
language of a draft Additional Protocol which, if implemented,
will give the IAEA crucial tools to catch a state cheating on its
commitments not to have nuclear weapons. These tools include
extensive information about nuclear fuel cycles, related
equipment and exports, far-reaching access for inspectors, and
the revolutionary scientific technique of environmental sampling,
which can provide unequivocal signatures of nuclear activities.
"This represents a major change in the culture of nuclear
safeguards and a bold step forward for verification generally,"
says Dr. Patricia Lewis, Director of VERTIC.
"However, Board agreement of the Protocol is not the end of the
story," adds Suzanna van Moyland, VERTIC's Arms Control and
Disarmament Researcher. "States must demonstrate their
commitment to non-proliferation by signing up to the Protocol and
through early implementation of this remarkable Programme."
For further information contact Dr. Patricia Lewis
(pml@vertic.org) or Suzanna van Moyland (svm@vertic.org).
The NAPSNet Daily Report aims to serve as a forum for dialogue
and exchange among peace and security specialists.
Conventions for readers and a list of acronyms and
abbreviations are available to all recipients.
For descriptions of the world wide web sites used to gather
information for this report, or for more information on web
sites with related information, see the collection of
other NAPSNet resources.
Produced by the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development.
Wade Huntley: napsnet@nautilus.org
Choi Chung-moon: cily@star.elim.net
Peter Razvin: icipu@glas.apc.org
Chunsi Wu: dlshen@fudan.ihep.ac.cn
Dingli Shen: dlshen@fudan.ihep.ac.cn
Hiroyasu Akutsu: akutsu@glocomnet.or.jp
Return to the top of this Daily Report
1. US-DPRK MIA Agreement
II. Republic of Korea
2. US Views of DPRK Threat and PRC Role
3. ROK Food Aid to DPRK
4. IAEA Inspectors Empowered
1. DPRK Famine Situation
III. Japan
2. ROK Red Cross Aid to DPRK
3. Vietnam Aids DPRK
4. DPRK Military to Oversee Farming
5. PRC Concern over DPRK Exodus
6. ROK Foreign Minister's Itinerary
7. IAEA Chief to Visit ROK
1. DPRK Missile Threat
IV. Press Releases
2. Japan-Russia Relations
3. US Asia-Pacific Defense Policy
4. Japan-DPRK Relations
5. DPRK Rice Diplomacy
6. Japan-US Defense Relations
I. United States
II. Republic of Korea
III. Japan
IV. Press Releases
We invite you to reply to today's report, and we welcome
commentary or papers for distribution to the network.
Berkeley, California, United States
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Moscow, Russian Federation
Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Tokyo, Japan