|
Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network DAILY REPORT For Tuesday, April 28, 1998, from Berkeley, California, USA |
1. Fuel Oil for DPRK
Dow Jones Newswires ("U.S. ASKS JAPAN TO HELP WITH FUEL OIL FOR N. KOREA - KYODO,"
Tokyo, 04/28/98) reported that Japan's Kyodo news agency on Wednesday quoted unnamed Japanese
government sources as saying that US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on Tuesday urged Japan to
share the financial burden of supplying fuel oil to the DPRK. Albright reportedly made the request in talks
with Foreign Minister Keizo Obuchi over bilateral cooperation in the Korean Peninsula Energy
Development Organization (KEDO). In a joint news conference with Obuchi afterwards, Albright stated,
"We ... considered the serious situation in North Korea and the need to come to satisfactory resolution on
funding of KEDO, which is vital for regional stability and peace." However, Japanese Foreign Ministry
spokesman Sadaaki Numata said, "Japan, at this moment, wants to concentrate on efforts on light-water
nuclear reactors." In a separate meeting Tuesday with Koichi Kato, secretary general of the ruling Liberal
Democratic Party, Albright said that there will be moves in the DPRK to try to operate its existing nuclear
facilities unless fuel oil is provided to the country. According to the Japanese Foreign Ministry, the US and
the European Union have so far this year decided to provide only US$47 million of the US$60 million
needed to pay for the 500,000 tons of fuel oil promised to the DPRK under the 1994 Geneva accord.
2. DPRK Famine
The Associated Press (George Gedda, "U.N. PROMISED ACCESS IN NORTH KOREA," Washington,
04/27/98) reported that Catherine Bertini, head of the UN World Food Program (WFP), said Monday that
the DPRK has assured UN relief officials that it will give agency monitors access to 49 counties that
previously were off-limits for security reasons. He stated that if the DPRK keeps its promise, the
program's monitors would be able to travel to all 210 counties in the nation, but if the DPRK reneges, the
WFP will reduce the 658,000 tons of food designated for 1998 by an amount proportional to the population
of the 49 counties. She added that the promise of nationwide access for the 46 WFP employees indicates
great progress from a few years ago when the DPRK restricted monitors to the area around Pyongyang.
Bertini said there has been a threefold attendance increase this year at monitored nurseries and
kindergartens thanks to the greater availability of WFP-donated food at these institutions, but she
emphasized that the DPRK food crisis remains "quite grave" in certain areas. She said that elderly persons
are rarely seen on streets because they are too weak to leave their homes, and malnutrition has left some
children "stunted for life, physically or mentally." At one hospital, she was told that for every 10 patients,
six are severely undernourished and three do not survive.
The Wall Street Journal (Eduardo Lachica, "U.N. AGENCY SAYS NORTH KOREA COULD NEED
YEARS OF FOOD AID," Washington, 04/28/98) reported that Catherine Bertini, executive director of the
UN World Food Program, said that the DPRK will remain dependent on foreign food aid for many more
years because of the effects of recent flood damage and a deteriorating economy. Basing her assessment
on a four-day trip to the DPRK earlier this month, Bertini said that she found food shortages worsening in
parts of the DPRK despite the buildup of international relief efforts since 1995. She added, "Without food,
people don't just go hungry. People get weaker and weaker, and ultimately they are more susceptible to
other diseases because they don't have enough nutritional support in their bodies." She said that during her
trip she heard reports that in the countryside people are subsisting on "roots, leaves and even bark" to make
up for dwindling food supplies. Meanwhile, two members of the US House of Representatives, Benjamin
Gilman (R-NY) and Doug Bereuter (R-NE), recently demanded that US President Bill Clinton reduce this
year's US aid contribution by 75,000 tons if the DPRK does not agree to allow at least 10 monitors,
preferably Korean-speaking US citizens, from US nongovernment organizations to observe the delivery of
the aid. However, the DPRK has so far been willing to admit no more than five US civilian monitors for
visits of two weeks. At the request of the US, the WFP has agreed to place the delivery of a 75,000-ton
portion of the US contribution in the care of a consortium of US private organizations. Bertini said that the
European Union is prepared to contribute 100,000 tons of food to the DPRK this year, but is still undecided
whether to send it through the WFP or its own distribution channels.
3. ROK-Japan Fisheries Talks
The Associated Press ("S. KOREA TO OPEN TALKS WITH JAPAN ON NEW FISHERIES PACT,"
Seoul, 04/28/98) reported that a nine-member ROK delegation led by Yoon Byong-sae, a deputy director
general at the Foreign Ministry, left Tuesday for Tokyo to open working-level talks with Japan on
concluding a new fisheries agreement. The two-day meeting Wednesday and Thursday is the first official
discussion between the two countries since Japan unilaterally abrogated an old pact in January.
4. ROK Financial Crisis
The Associated Press ("S. KOREAN PROSECUTORS SEND QUESTIONS TO FORMER PRES KIM,"
Seoul, 04/28/98) reported that ROK prosecution officials said Tuesday that they have sent written
questions to former President Kim Young-sam on whether his economic advisers lied to him about the
severity of the ROK financial crisis. They said that as soon as they receive Kim's answers, they will call in
former Finance Minister Kang Kyong-shik and former chief presidential economic adviser Kim In-ho for
possible criminal indictment.
5. US Secretary of State Visits Asia
The Associated Press (Barry Schweid, "ALBRIGHT BEGINS ASIA TRIP," Tokyo, 04/28/98) reported
that US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright paid a courtesy call Tuesday on the Japanese government at
the start of her trip to Asia. Albright was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto
following earlier sessions with Foreign Minister Keizo Obuchi and Koichi Kato, a leader of the ruling
Liberal Democrats. Hashimoto and Obuchi are expected to provide her with a report on meetings
Hashimoto held last week with Russian President Boris Yeltsin.
6. Japanese Reaction to Clinton's PRC Trip
The Los Angeles Times carried an analytical article (Tom Plate, "IN A TENSE RELATIONSHIP, SMALL
SLIGHTS HURT," Tokyo, 04/28/98) which said that many Japanese worry that US President Bill Clinton's
decision to exclude a stopover in Japan after his trip to the PRC might indicate that improvements in US-
PRC relations could come at the expense of good Japan-US relations. The article said that officials are
concerned that growing tensions in the Japanese-US relationship will prompt the Japanese public to
interpret the President's decision as a snub of Japan. Former Japanese diplomat Yoshio Hatano was quoted
as saying, "On balance, Clinton would do himself a lot of good if he dropped by, even for one afternoon."
Takeshi Kondo, a top executive of the Japanese trading firm Itochu Corp., argued, "The omission will give
America's enemies in Japan a golden opportunity to criticize; it will send the wrong message to the
Japanese public, and it will lead the Chinese to misunderstand the nature of the Japan-U.S. relationship. It
is a fundamental strategic mistake."
7. Japanese Finance Ministry Scandal
The Washington Post (Sandra Sugawara, "JAPANESE PUNISH FINANCE OFFICIALS," Tokyo
04/28/98, A11) reported that the Japanese Ministry of Finance announced Tuesday that it had disciplined
112 of its officials for improperly accepting meals and entertainment from financial institutions that they
supervise. Two senior officials, including the head of the securities bureau, resigned, while others received
official reprimands.
8. Alleged Russian Aid to Indian Missile Development
United Press International ("RUSSIA AIDS INDIA ON MISSILE," New York, 04/27/98) reported that US
administration officials said that Russia may be helping India develop a submarine-borne missile, the
Sagarika. The New York Times reported that Russia maintained that it has given limited help and was not
violating a 1993 agreement between the US and Russia not to aid in the spread of ballistic-missile
technology. Unnamed administration officials said that Russian assistance has been going on for three
years, despite appeals from Vice President Al Gore and others.
United Press International ("INDIA DENIES NEW YORK TIMES REPORT," New Delhi, 04/27/98)
reported that Indian Foreign Ministry officials said that there is no truth to a New York Times report that
Russia is helping India build a sea-launched ballistic missile that could carry a nuclear warhead deep into
Pakistan.
9. US Nuclear Weapons Maintenance
The Washington Post (Walter Pincus, "NEW METHODS HELP MAINTAIN NUCLEAR ARMS,"
04/28/98, A06) reported that the US Department of Energy (DOE) is overseeing a US$4.1 billion-a-year
stockpile stewardship and management program to rebuild some of the approximately 9,000 nuclear
warheads that remain in the US arsenal to extend the life of some weapons for at least 25 more years.
According to Gene Ives, deputy assistant secretary of energy for military applications and stockpile
management, the Mark 21 reentry vehicles that contain the W87 nuclear warheads on MX intercontinental
ballistic missiles are scheduled to be taken off those ICBMs and refurbished. The Mark 21/W87
combination was chosen as the first nuclear weapon to be refurbished under the program because of its
potential role after the ratification of START II. Greg Mello, director of the Los Alamos Study Group, a
collection of 39 disarmament and environmental groups, said that the DOE program reveals "a shocking
disregard for U.S. commitments, especially those enshrined in the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to end
the nuclear arms race." However, Thomas Graham, a former senior official with the Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency, said that without the DOE program, the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
would have almost no chance for approval by the US Senate. C. Bruce Tarter, director of the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, told Congress recently, "Material breakdown occurs from exposure to
radiation, higher than normal temperatures and gases that accumulate over time in a hermetically sealed
weapon environment." However, Tarter added that "no signs of catastrophic aging" have been found in the
DOE's stockpile stewardship program. According to a DOE publication, with seven nuclear missile and
bomb systems now operational and the average age of each at 15 years, the US stockpile "is older than ever
before." [Ed. note: Stephen Schwartz of the Brookings Institution claimed that the Washington Post
article contains several factual errors. See Section 2, below.]
1. US Nuclear Weapons Maintenance
[Ed. note: Stephen I. Schwartz, Director of the US Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project at the Brookings
Institution, claims to have found the following eight factual errors in Walter Pincus' article in the
Washington Post on April 28, which was summarized in item 9 in the US Section, above. The complete
text of the Washington Post article can be obtained online or by sending a request to the NAPSNet coordinator.]
1. The exact yield of the W87 warhead for the MX missile is classified (as are the yields of nearly all other
warheads, past and present). But the best and most accurate publicly available data come from the Nuclear
Weapons Databook Project at the Natural Resources Defense Council, which has for years placed the yield
at 300 kilotons.
2. Therefore, each W87 has a yield 20 times greater than the 15 kiloton bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
3. The DOE has stated that its stockpile stewardship and management program is expected to cost US$45
billion over ten years, for an average annual cost of US$4.5 billion a year (this year the DOE anticipates it
will spend US$4.3 billion). In fact, this average annual cost is US$800-900 million more per year (in
constant 1996 dollars) than what the Atomic Energy Commission and the DOE spent on average during the
Cold War (1948-1991), when nuclear testing and nuclear weapons production were in full operation.
4. There are only (and have never been more than) 50 MX missiles deployed at F.E. Warren Air Force
Base in Wyoming and each carries 10 W87s (according to the NRDC).
5. While there has never been a full-scale test of an actual ICBM launch over the North Pole to targets
inside Russia (or vice-versa), it is wrong to infer that no launch-to-target testing has occurred or that
nuclear warheads have never been carried into space and successfully detonated.
Between August 27 and September 6, 1958, the Department of Defense conducted OPERATION ARGUS,
a series of three clandestine tests in the South Atlantic about 1,100 miles southwest of Capetown, South
Africa. In each test, specially modified Lockheed X-17a three-stage ballistic missiles were launched from
the USS Norton Sound carrying low-yield (1.7 kiloton) W25 warheads. Each warhead detonated at a
height of about 300 miles. The purpose of the tests was the study how very high-altitude detonations might
interfere with communications equipment and ballistic missile performance. On May 6, 1962, the
submarine USS Ethan Allen (SSBN 608) launched a Polaris A2 missile while submerged about 1,500
nautical miles east-northeast of Christmas Island in the Pacific Ocean in a test code-named "Frigate Bird."
The missile's re-entry vehicle traveled about 1,020 nautical miles toward the island, detonating at an
altitude of 8,300 feet. The yield of the W47Y1 warhead has been estimated at 600 kilotons. "Frigate Bird"
was the first and only operational test of a U.S. SSBN/SLBM weapon system.
Finally, between July 9 and November 1, 1962, the United States successfully launched three Thor
intermediate-range ballistic missiles and one STRYPI rocket from (or in the vicinity of) Johnston Island,
780 miles west-southwest of Hawaii. The "Starfish Prime" test detonated a 1.45 megaton W45 warhead at
a height of 248 miles; the "Checkmate" test detonated a low-yield XW-50X1 at a height of 91.5 miles; the
"Bluegill Triple Prime" test detonated a W50 warhead with a submegaton yield at a height of 30 miles; and
the "Kingfish" test detonated a W50 warhead with a submegaton yield at a height of 60 miles.
6. The Partial Test Ban Treaty was ratified and entered into force on October 10, 1963. However, the last
U.S. atmospheric nuclear test ("Tightrope") took place on November 4, 1962, 13 miles above Johnston
Island, using a low-yield W31 warhead carried aboard a Nike Hercules missile. The last nuclear weapon
dropped from a plane ("Housatonic") was a megaton range device dropped from a B-52 bomber on
October 30, 1962 and detonated 12,130 feet above Johnston Island.
7. All nuclear test sites used by the United States in the Pacific between 1946-1962 (Enewetak and Bikini
Atolls, which together comprised the Pacific Proving Ground, Christmas Island, and Johnston Island) are
above the equator and therefore in the North Pacific.
8. There are currently nine types of operational nuclear warheads and gravity bombs in the U.S. stockpile.
These weapons are carried aboard two types of ICBMs, two types of SLBMs, three types of cruise missiles,
two types of strategic bombers, and several types of tactical aircraft:
--B61 Mods 3, 4, 10 (Air Force and NATO tactical aircraft) --B61 Mod 7 (B-2A; B-52H) --B61 Mod 11
(B-2A; F-16) --W62 (Minuteman III) --W76 (Trident I/C4) --W78 (Minuteman III) --W80-0 (Sea-
Launched Cruise Missile) --W80-1 (Air-Launched Cruise Missile; B-52H) --W80-1 (Advanced Cruise
Missile; B-52H) --B83 (B-2A; B-52H) --W87 (MX) --W88 (Trident II/D5)
In addition, an estimated 400 W84 warheads from the Ground-Launched Cruise Missiles removed under
the INF Treaty are being held in reserve status by the DOD at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico.
Finally, the Los Alamos Study Group is not "a collection of 39 disarmament and environmental groups."
Pincus has confused LASG with the coalition of organizations (led by NRDC) which is suing DOE over
the stockpile stewardship program.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aims to serve as a forum for dialogue
and exchange among peace and security specialists.
Conventions for readers and a list of acronyms and
abbreviations are available to all recipients.
For descriptions of the world wide web sites used to gather
information for this report, or for more information on web
sites with related information, see the collection of
other NAPSNet resources.
Produced by the Nautilus Institute for Security and
Sustainable Development in partnership with:
Wade L. Huntley: napsnet@nautilus.org
Timothy L. Savage: napsnet@nautilus.org
Shin Dong-bom: dongbom_shin@wisenet.co.kr
Choi Chung-moon: cily@star.elim.co.kr
Hiroyasu Akutsu: akutsu@glocomnet.or.jp
Peter Razvin: icipu@glas.apc.org
Chunsi Wu: dlshen@fudan.ac.cn
Dingli Shen: dlshen@fudan.ac.cn
Return to the Top of this Daily Report
[Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Next Item][Contents]
[Prev. Item][Contents][Credits]
We invite you to reply to today's report, and we welcome
commentary or papers for distribution to the network.
The Center for International Studies,
Yonsei
University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
The Center for Global Communications, Tokyo,
Japan
Center for American
Studies,
Fudan University, Shanghai, People's
Republic of China
Berkeley, California, United States
Berkeley, California, United States
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Tokyo, Japan
Moscow, Russian Federation
Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Shanghai, People's Republic of China