Nautilus Institute Nautilus Highights Archive
   
Updated Friday, January 9, 2004


Navigation   

2003 Nautilus Highights Achive

Dec. | Nov. | Oct. | Sept. | Aug. | July | June | May | April | March | Feb. | Jan.
2002      2001



November Nautilus Highights - posted December 3, 2003

November Nautilus Highights - posted December 3, 2003

October Nautilus Highights - posted November 5, 2003

September Nautilus Highights - posted October 8, 2003

August Nautilus Highights - posted September 3, 2003

July Nautilus Highights - posted August 5, 2003

June Nautilus Highights - posted July 1, 2003

May Nautilus Highights - posted Joune 9, 2003

Apr. Nautilus Highights - posted April 1, 2003

Mar. Nautilus Highights - posted April 1, 2003

Nautilus Highights - posted March 11, 2003

    Dear Colleague:

    Here is the alert and media coverage of the Nautilus Institute's release of the Pentagon's 1966 study on nuclear war-fighting options in the Vietnam War. The lessons from this 1966 report are important today in the context of defining the accountability of U.S. policy-makers on the prospective use of nuclear weapons in Iraq, North Korea and the war on terrorism.

    Regards, Peter Hayes

    Nautilus Releases De-Classified Vietnam War Nuclear First-Use Study

    On March 9, 2003, the Nautilus Institute released the JASON 1966 study "Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Southeast Asia" for the Pentagon. The report concluded that nuclear weapons in the Vietnam War would have been militarily ineffective, could lead to annihilation of US troops, and would be politically catastrophic.

    It argued that attacking insurgents with nuclear weapons would lead to insurgent nuclear counter-attack; and that nuclear supplying states that are normally self-deterred or deterred by the prospect of US retaliation might be prompted by US first use against insurgents to transfer nuclear weapons to insurgents. This argument is highly relevant to the pending wars against Iraq and against North Korea, and in the war on terrorism against transnationally networked insurgencies like Al Queda.

    Peter Hayes and Nina Tannenwald analyzed the report in essays in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and the Los Angeles Times, also published on March 9, 2003.

    The same day, Nautilus also published commentaries by the four authors of the report, including Freeman Dyson and Steven Weinberg, the winner of 1979 Nobel Prize for physics. Nautilus also published two essays on the relevance of the report to the war on terrorism and the pending wars on Iraq and North Korea, one by Willis Stanley, and the other by Michael Levi.

    On Monday, March 10, 2003, Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, read parts of the declassified report into the Congressional Record on Monday.

    All these items plus the original report and other background information are available at:
    http://www.nautilus.org/VietnamFOIA/

    Donors who supported the Nautilus Institute's FOIA research over the 19 years it took to bring this document into the public domain include: Ford Foundation; HKH Foundation; MacArthur Foundation; Ploughshares Fund; Rockefeller Foundation; and W. Alton Jones Foundation.

    Selected Media Coverage

    Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

    Los Angeles Times

    NPR's "Weekend Edition"

    Washington Post

    San Francisco Chronicle

    Oakland Tribune

Feb. Nautilus Highights - posted March 11, 2003

Jan. Nautilus Highights - posted February 7, 2003


Top of Page


 

 
 
Nautilus Institute Publications Digital Library Policy Forum Online Nautilus Research Kiosk Signup for Nautilus Email Services Related Weblinks Nautilus Institute Home Global Peace

and Security Program Energy, Security and Environment Program Globalization and Governance Program Youth/Pegasus Program Search the Nautilus Site