13. US Missile Defense
The Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies reviews the US assessment of the ballistic missile threat which the Clinton administration has said it will use to decide whether to deploy a national missile defense system. The Washington Post notes that missile defense is likely to become an issue in November's presidential campaign.
"Assessing the Assessment: The 1999 National Intelligence Estimate of the Ballistic Missile Threat"
"An Issue Gains Altitude"
"Heat Is on Anti-Missile Defense"
Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr. argues in Arms Control Today that the extent and significance of the missile threat to the US has taken on an increasingly central role in the debate over US missile defense. "Consequently, the question arises whether there is really a credible missile threat from North Korea and other 'rogue' states that justifies deployment, despite the high technical risk and negative consequences." US Senator Carl Levin, in the keynote address at the 28th annual luncheon and membership meeting of the Arms Control Association, discussed the strategic ramifications of deploying a national missile defense and examining the possibility that a cooperative arrangement could be reached with Russia that would allow for a limited U.S. national missile defense while reducing the number of deployed strategic weapons below START II levels.
"Telling It Like It Isn't"
"Toward an Agreement With Russia on Missile Defense"